TY - JOUR
T1 - Bending performance of 3D re-entrant and hexagonal metamaterials
AU - Zhang, Xue Gang
AU - Jiang, Wei
AU - Zhang, Yi
AU - Han, Dong
AU - Luo, Chen
AU - Zhang, Xiang Yu
AU - Hao, Jian
AU - Xie, Yi Min
AU - Ren, Xin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Auxetic structures have theoretically superior bending resistance that was previously inaccessible. Compared with the planar two-dimensional (2D) auxetic structures, the three-dimensional (3D) counterparts may exhibit auxetic behavior in multiple directions. Recently, increasing studies have been devoted to studying the mechanical properties of 3D auxetic structures. In this paper, two 3D honeycomb structures were proposed, namely 3D re-entrant honeycomb and 3D hexagonal honeycomb. Subsequently, the mechanical properties, deformation modes, and deformation mechanisms of these two honeycomb structures under three-point bending were investigated experimentally and numerically. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic hexagonal honeycomb, the 3D auxetic re-entrant honeycomb exhibits higher ductility and fracture resistance. In addition, unlike the conventional honeycomb structure, the mid-span section of the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits a trapezoidal deformation mode under bending. Finally, the influence of the number of unit cells and geometric parameters on the mechanical properties of the 3D honeycomb structure were systematically studied by parametric analysis. The excellent bending performance provides a basis for the application of auxetic honeycomb in the fields of biomedicine, soft robots, and buffer devices.
AB - Auxetic structures have theoretically superior bending resistance that was previously inaccessible. Compared with the planar two-dimensional (2D) auxetic structures, the three-dimensional (3D) counterparts may exhibit auxetic behavior in multiple directions. Recently, increasing studies have been devoted to studying the mechanical properties of 3D auxetic structures. In this paper, two 3D honeycomb structures were proposed, namely 3D re-entrant honeycomb and 3D hexagonal honeycomb. Subsequently, the mechanical properties, deformation modes, and deformation mechanisms of these two honeycomb structures under three-point bending were investigated experimentally and numerically. Compared with the 3D non-auxetic hexagonal honeycomb, the 3D auxetic re-entrant honeycomb exhibits higher ductility and fracture resistance. In addition, unlike the conventional honeycomb structure, the mid-span section of the 3D auxetic honeycomb exhibits a trapezoidal deformation mode under bending. Finally, the influence of the number of unit cells and geometric parameters on the mechanical properties of the 3D honeycomb structure were systematically studied by parametric analysis. The excellent bending performance provides a basis for the application of auxetic honeycomb in the fields of biomedicine, soft robots, and buffer devices.
KW - 3D honeycomb
KW - Auxetic
KW - Mechanical metamaterials
KW - Mechanical properties
KW - Three-point bending
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85160573102&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110829
DO - 10.1016/j.tws.2023.110829
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85160573102
SN - 0263-8231
VL - 188
JO - Thin-Walled Structures
JF - Thin-Walled Structures
M1 - 110829
ER -