TY - JOUR
T1 - Comparative study of structures, thermal stabilities and dielectric properties for a ferroelectric MOF [Sr(μ-BDC)(DMF)]∞ with its solvent-free framework
AU - Guo, Ping Chun
AU - Chu, Zhenyu
AU - Ren, Xiao Ming
AU - Ning, Wei Hua
AU - Jin, Wanqin
PY - 2013/3/11
Y1 - 2013/3/11
N2 - A ferroelectric MOF with a formula [Sr(μ-BDC)(DMF)]∞ (1) was transformed into [Sr(μ-BDC)(CH2Cl2)x]∞ (2) using a solvent exchange approach, where DMF = N, N-dimethylformamide and BDC2− = benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate. The lattice solvents, CH2Cl2 molecules, in 2 were removed by heating to give the solvent-free metal–organic framework [Sr(μ-BDC)]∞ (3) and the crystal-to-crystal transformation is reversible between 1 and 3. The release of DMF molecules from 1 results in the metal–organic framework of [Sr(μ-BDC)]∞ expanding a little along the a- and b-axes. The crystal structure optimizations for 1 and 3 disclosed that the lattice expansion is associated with the alternations of the bond distances and angles in the Sr2+ ion coordination sphere along the a- and b-axes directions. The metal–organic framework 3 collapses at temperatures of more than 600 °C; such an extremely high thermal stability is related to the closed-shell electronic structure of the Sr2+ ion, namely, the coordinate bond between the closed-shell Sr2+ ion and the bridged BDC2− ligands does not have a preferred direction, which is favored for reducing lattice strains and is responsible for the higher thermal stability. The comparative investigations for the dielectric and ferroelectric behaviors of 1 and 3 confirmed that the motion of the polar DMF molecules, but not the [Sr(μ-BDC)]∞ framework, is responsible for the ferroelectric properties of 1.
AB - A ferroelectric MOF with a formula [Sr(μ-BDC)(DMF)]∞ (1) was transformed into [Sr(μ-BDC)(CH2Cl2)x]∞ (2) using a solvent exchange approach, where DMF = N, N-dimethylformamide and BDC2− = benzene-1,4-dicarboxylate. The lattice solvents, CH2Cl2 molecules, in 2 were removed by heating to give the solvent-free metal–organic framework [Sr(μ-BDC)]∞ (3) and the crystal-to-crystal transformation is reversible between 1 and 3. The release of DMF molecules from 1 results in the metal–organic framework of [Sr(μ-BDC)]∞ expanding a little along the a- and b-axes. The crystal structure optimizations for 1 and 3 disclosed that the lattice expansion is associated with the alternations of the bond distances and angles in the Sr2+ ion coordination sphere along the a- and b-axes directions. The metal–organic framework 3 collapses at temperatures of more than 600 °C; such an extremely high thermal stability is related to the closed-shell electronic structure of the Sr2+ ion, namely, the coordinate bond between the closed-shell Sr2+ ion and the bridged BDC2− ligands does not have a preferred direction, which is favored for reducing lattice strains and is responsible for the higher thermal stability. The comparative investigations for the dielectric and ferroelectric behaviors of 1 and 3 confirmed that the motion of the polar DMF molecules, but not the [Sr(μ-BDC)]∞ framework, is responsible for the ferroelectric properties of 1.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84879993039&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1039/c3dt32880e
DO - 10.1039/c3dt32880e
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84879993039
SN - 1470-479X
VL - 42
SP - 6603
EP - 6610
JO - Journal of the Chemical Society. Dalton Transactions
JF - Journal of the Chemical Society. Dalton Transactions
IS - 18
ER -