TY - JOUR
T1 - Sustainable production of methanol using landfill gas via carbon dioxide reforming and hydrogenation
T2 - Process development and techno-economic analysis
AU - Gao, Ruxing
AU - Zhang, Chundong
AU - Lee, Yun Jo
AU - Kwak, Geunjae
AU - Jun, Ki Won
AU - Kim, Seok Ki
AU - Park, Hae Gu
AU - Guan, Guofeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2020/11/1
Y1 - 2020/11/1
N2 - Aiming at achieving the large-scale CO2-equivalent reduction in the landfill industry, conceptual design of two sustainable landfill gas-to-methanol process options without the pre-treatment and methanol upgrading sections were implemented via using Aspen Plus simulator. In both proposed options, the optimum syngas ratio (H2/(2CO + 3CO2) = 1) is fulfilled by either supplying additional H2 (option 1) or pre-separating the surplus CO2 in LFG using membrane (option 2). A comparative techno-economic analysis was carried out to determine the energy efficiency and the CO2-equivalent reduction rate, as well as the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), and the discounted payback period (DPBP) of both proposed options. It is shown that both options 1 and 2 can be regarded as alternative processes for converting landfill gas to methanol, and option 1 is more energy efficient and eco-friendly, while, option 2 is more economically competitive. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the CAPEX, the prices of methanol, CO2 allowance, and H2 are the most sensitive factors, and option 1 can be economically comparable with option 2 given that the H2 price can be lowered down to around 1000 $/Mt. This work provides two candidate process routes for efficient conversion of landfill gas to value-added methanol, which makes the landfill industry become more sustainable and profitable, especially in the event of a future high carbon tax and low H2 price.
AB - Aiming at achieving the large-scale CO2-equivalent reduction in the landfill industry, conceptual design of two sustainable landfill gas-to-methanol process options without the pre-treatment and methanol upgrading sections were implemented via using Aspen Plus simulator. In both proposed options, the optimum syngas ratio (H2/(2CO + 3CO2) = 1) is fulfilled by either supplying additional H2 (option 1) or pre-separating the surplus CO2 in LFG using membrane (option 2). A comparative techno-economic analysis was carried out to determine the energy efficiency and the CO2-equivalent reduction rate, as well as the net present value (NPV), the internal rate of return (IRR), and the discounted payback period (DPBP) of both proposed options. It is shown that both options 1 and 2 can be regarded as alternative processes for converting landfill gas to methanol, and option 1 is more energy efficient and eco-friendly, while, option 2 is more economically competitive. Moreover, a sensitivity analysis indicates that the CAPEX, the prices of methanol, CO2 allowance, and H2 are the most sensitive factors, and option 1 can be economically comparable with option 2 given that the H2 price can be lowered down to around 1000 $/Mt. This work provides two candidate process routes for efficient conversion of landfill gas to value-added methanol, which makes the landfill industry become more sustainable and profitable, especially in the event of a future high carbon tax and low H2 price.
KW - CO utilization
KW - Economic analysis
KW - Greenhouse gas
KW - Landfill gas
KW - Methanol synthesis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088218920&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122552
DO - 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.122552
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85088218920
SN - 0959-6526
VL - 272
JO - Journal of Cleaner Production
JF - Journal of Cleaner Production
M1 - 122552
ER -