TY - JOUR
T1 - Accelerated piloted ignition on an edge of a PMMA cube
AU - Gong, Junhui
AU - Sun, Xiaolu
AU - Delichatsios, Michael A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2025/3
Y1 - 2025/3
N2 - Ignition on solid edges is easier compared to that on flat surfaces, featuring higher fire hazard. To reveal this unique ignition mechanism, an apparatus capable of emitting two horizontal perpendicular heat fluxes, defined as q1 and q2, was built to conduct piloted ignition tests on vertical edges of PMMA cubes. Two sets of tests were designed: (1) q1 = q2, denoted as SET1; (2) q1 remained unchanged while q2 varied, denoted as SET2. For comparison, 1D ignition tests of vertical samples were also performed. Edge and surface temperatures, mass loss rate (MLR), and ignition time (tig) were collected. Results showed that ignition on edge was accelerated compared to 1D ignition. The numerical solver neglecting edge regression captured measured surface temperature but overpredicted edge temperature. Attributed by the same reason, experimental MLRs and tig of SET1 and SET2 cannot be accurately estimated by the numerical model. Critical MLR in SET1 and SET2 declined with lower heat flux but remained unchanged in 1D ignition. Critical temperature was identified to be 656.4 ± 3.5 K. In SET1, tig-0.5 linearly depended on heat flux, whereas no such linearity existed in SET2. Using measured tig and analytical models, thermal inertia of PMMA and critical heat flux were estimated.
AB - Ignition on solid edges is easier compared to that on flat surfaces, featuring higher fire hazard. To reveal this unique ignition mechanism, an apparatus capable of emitting two horizontal perpendicular heat fluxes, defined as q1 and q2, was built to conduct piloted ignition tests on vertical edges of PMMA cubes. Two sets of tests were designed: (1) q1 = q2, denoted as SET1; (2) q1 remained unchanged while q2 varied, denoted as SET2. For comparison, 1D ignition tests of vertical samples were also performed. Edge and surface temperatures, mass loss rate (MLR), and ignition time (tig) were collected. Results showed that ignition on edge was accelerated compared to 1D ignition. The numerical solver neglecting edge regression captured measured surface temperature but overpredicted edge temperature. Attributed by the same reason, experimental MLRs and tig of SET1 and SET2 cannot be accurately estimated by the numerical model. Critical MLR in SET1 and SET2 declined with lower heat flux but remained unchanged in 1D ignition. Critical temperature was identified to be 656.4 ± 3.5 K. In SET1, tig-0.5 linearly depended on heat flux, whereas no such linearity existed in SET2. Using measured tig and analytical models, thermal inertia of PMMA and critical heat flux were estimated.
KW - Critical heat flux
KW - Critical temperature
KW - Ignition on edge
KW - PMMA cubes
KW - Two perpendicular heat fluxes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85210759869&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104296
DO - 10.1016/j.firesaf.2024.104296
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85210759869
SN - 0379-7112
VL - 151
JO - Fire Safety Journal
JF - Fire Safety Journal
M1 - 104296
ER -