TY - JOUR
T1 - Carbon-neutral light olefins production for energy decarbonization
T2 - Process development and techno-econo-environmental analysis
AU - Zhang, Leiyu
AU - Gao, Ruxing
AU - Wang, Lei
AU - Zhang, Chundong
AU - Jun, Ki Won
AU - Kim, Seok Ki
AU - Zhao, Tiansheng
AU - Wan, Hui
AU - Guan, Guofeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2023/9/1
Y1 - 2023/9/1
N2 - Low-carbon olefins, as important platform molecules, are generally produced by limited fossil energy, resulting in massive carbon emissions and intensive energy consumption inevitably. Therefore, it is necessary to develop clean and sustainable alternatives. With this in mind, three low-carbon olefin production processes using waste CO2 and green H2 were proposed, including the methanol-mediated (Option A) and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS)-based CO2-to-olefin (CTO) processes. Herein, the FTS-based CTO processes are classified into the direct (Option B) and indirect routes (Option C) without/with the reverse water–gas-shift unit. Meanwhile, rigorous process models were established, and detailed mass and energy balances of three processes were obtained with the aid of the process simulator. Moreover, in order to evaluate the feasibility and compare the differences in process performances of three proposed processes quantitatively, comprehensive techno-econo-environmental assessments of three processes were conducted at the system level. The results indicate that, firstly, from a technical perspective, the FTS-based processes are more competitive than the methanol-mediated process due to their higher energy efficiency (67.93%) and carbon utilization efficiency (84.22%). Secondly, from an economic perspective, the methanol-mediated process has a better economic prospect in the minimum olefin selling price (2527.08 $/tonne C2–C4 olefins). Lastly, from an environmental perspective, the methanol-mediated process is more environmentally friendly owing to its lower CO2-eq emissions (61.13 kg CO2-eq/tonne C2–C4). Moreover, for two FTS-based processes, the direct route is favorable in energy efficiency and minimum olefin selling price, whereas the indirect route is preferable in the carbon utilization efficiency and environmental impacts. Overall, the study provides novel approaches for the production of low-carbon olefins, and is of significant importance for reducing carbon footprint and achieving carbon neutrality.
AB - Low-carbon olefins, as important platform molecules, are generally produced by limited fossil energy, resulting in massive carbon emissions and intensive energy consumption inevitably. Therefore, it is necessary to develop clean and sustainable alternatives. With this in mind, three low-carbon olefin production processes using waste CO2 and green H2 were proposed, including the methanol-mediated (Option A) and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (FTS)-based CO2-to-olefin (CTO) processes. Herein, the FTS-based CTO processes are classified into the direct (Option B) and indirect routes (Option C) without/with the reverse water–gas-shift unit. Meanwhile, rigorous process models were established, and detailed mass and energy balances of three processes were obtained with the aid of the process simulator. Moreover, in order to evaluate the feasibility and compare the differences in process performances of three proposed processes quantitatively, comprehensive techno-econo-environmental assessments of three processes were conducted at the system level. The results indicate that, firstly, from a technical perspective, the FTS-based processes are more competitive than the methanol-mediated process due to their higher energy efficiency (67.93%) and carbon utilization efficiency (84.22%). Secondly, from an economic perspective, the methanol-mediated process has a better economic prospect in the minimum olefin selling price (2527.08 $/tonne C2–C4 olefins). Lastly, from an environmental perspective, the methanol-mediated process is more environmentally friendly owing to its lower CO2-eq emissions (61.13 kg CO2-eq/tonne C2–C4). Moreover, for two FTS-based processes, the direct route is favorable in energy efficiency and minimum olefin selling price, whereas the indirect route is preferable in the carbon utilization efficiency and environmental impacts. Overall, the study provides novel approaches for the production of low-carbon olefins, and is of significant importance for reducing carbon footprint and achieving carbon neutrality.
KW - CO hydrogenation
KW - Environmental analysis
KW - Low-carbon olefins
KW - Process modelling
KW - Techno-economic analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85164278348&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144611
DO - 10.1016/j.cej.2023.144611
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85164278348
SN - 1385-8947
VL - 471
JO - Chemical Engineering Journal
JF - Chemical Engineering Journal
M1 - 144611
ER -