TY - JOUR
T1 - Characterization of the adhesion of thin palladium membranes supported on tubular porous ceramics
AU - Huang, Yan
AU - Shu, Shili
AU - Lu, Zhen
AU - Fan, Yiqun
PY - 2007/5/7
Y1 - 2007/5/7
N2 - Thin palladium membranes supported on porous materials, i.e. composite membranes are excellent hydrogen separators and purifiers, and the adhesion of the palladium layer is a key factor for membrane stability. To determine the adhesion of composite palladium membranes, particularly tubular membranes, the methodological studies are quite few in literature. This work employed five methods to characterize the adhesion of typical tubular composite palladium membranes: cross-cut test, thermal-shock test, hydrogen embrittling test, pull-off test and the pressure tolerating test, the first three of which are qualitative and the others are quantitative. These methods except for the thermal-shock test can successfully distinguish the adhesion difference of the tested membrane specimen. It can be concluded that a single method may give biased or wrong results, and only the testing with different methods together can provide all-round information. It was confirmed that the porous support with rougher surface and larger pores favors the adhesion of the palladium membrane.
AB - Thin palladium membranes supported on porous materials, i.e. composite membranes are excellent hydrogen separators and purifiers, and the adhesion of the palladium layer is a key factor for membrane stability. To determine the adhesion of composite palladium membranes, particularly tubular membranes, the methodological studies are quite few in literature. This work employed five methods to characterize the adhesion of typical tubular composite palladium membranes: cross-cut test, thermal-shock test, hydrogen embrittling test, pull-off test and the pressure tolerating test, the first three of which are qualitative and the others are quantitative. These methods except for the thermal-shock test can successfully distinguish the adhesion difference of the tested membrane specimen. It can be concluded that a single method may give biased or wrong results, and only the testing with different methods together can provide all-round information. It was confirmed that the porous support with rougher surface and larger pores favors the adhesion of the palladium membrane.
KW - Adhesion
KW - Composite palladium membrane
KW - Hydrogen embrittlement
KW - Surface roughness
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33947722008&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.182
DO - 10.1016/j.tsf.2006.12.182
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:33947722008
SN - 0040-6090
VL - 515
SP - 5233
EP - 5240
JO - Thin Solid Films
JF - Thin Solid Films
IS - 13
ER -