TY - JOUR
T1 - Conceptual design of full carbon upcycling of CO2 into clean DME fuel
T2 - Techno-economic assessment and process optimization
AU - Gao, Ruxing
AU - Zhang, Leiyu
AU - Wang, Lei
AU - Zhang, Chundong
AU - Jun, Ki Won
AU - Ki Kim, Seok
AU - Zhao, Tiansheng
AU - Wan, Hui
AU - Guan, Guofeng
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2023/7/15
Y1 - 2023/7/15
N2 - To achieve efficient utilization of CO2 and produce clean alternative fuel, nowadays, CO2-to-DME (CTD) technology is regarded as a feasible and promising solution. Considering that there is no consensus on the techno-economic performances of the different CTD processes, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the existing and emerging CTD technologies and to deeply explore the influence of the process integration on technical feasibility and economic profitability. In this study, we proposed four CTD processes via different routes, namely purified methanol-mediated (Case 1), water-containing methanol-mediated (Case 2), CO-mediated (Case 3) and direct CO2 hydrogenation routes (Case 4). The rigorous system modelling and comprehensive comparison of the process performances of four cases were implemented. From the technical perspective, Case 4 has the highest energy efficiency (77.42%), exergy efficiency (88.46%), and net CO2 mitigation rate (67.71%). From the economic perspective, Case 2 has the lowest total product cost (1327.14 $/tonne DME), whereas Case 4 has the lowest net CO2 mitigation cost (589.34 $/tonne CO2). Moreover, to further enhance the system performance of Case 4, we also proposed effective improvement measures for process optimization, which shows that the net CO2 mitigation rate is enhanced by 1.94%, while the net CO2 mitigation cost is reduced by 19.79 $/tonne CO2.
AB - To achieve efficient utilization of CO2 and produce clean alternative fuel, nowadays, CO2-to-DME (CTD) technology is regarded as a feasible and promising solution. Considering that there is no consensus on the techno-economic performances of the different CTD processes, it is necessary to conduct a comprehensive and systematic comparison of the existing and emerging CTD technologies and to deeply explore the influence of the process integration on technical feasibility and economic profitability. In this study, we proposed four CTD processes via different routes, namely purified methanol-mediated (Case 1), water-containing methanol-mediated (Case 2), CO-mediated (Case 3) and direct CO2 hydrogenation routes (Case 4). The rigorous system modelling and comprehensive comparison of the process performances of four cases were implemented. From the technical perspective, Case 4 has the highest energy efficiency (77.42%), exergy efficiency (88.46%), and net CO2 mitigation rate (67.71%). From the economic perspective, Case 2 has the lowest total product cost (1327.14 $/tonne DME), whereas Case 4 has the lowest net CO2 mitigation cost (589.34 $/tonne CO2). Moreover, to further enhance the system performance of Case 4, we also proposed effective improvement measures for process optimization, which shows that the net CO2 mitigation rate is enhanced by 1.94%, while the net CO2 mitigation cost is reduced by 19.79 $/tonne CO2.
KW - CO hydrogenation
KW - DME synthesis
KW - Environmental analysis
KW - Process modelling
KW - Techno-economic analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85150032641&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128120
DO - 10.1016/j.fuel.2023.128120
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:85150032641
SN - 0016-2361
VL - 344
JO - Fuel
JF - Fuel
M1 - 128120
ER -