摘要
The arguments that are given in the original trialogue in favor of a quadruply bonded C2, in which the bond is claimed to be stronger than that in HC/CH, are judged invalid by the authors of this Correspondence. They also disagree with some statements about the stability of molecules and the virtue of chemical research beyond synthetic chemistry.
源语言 | 英语 |
---|---|
页(从-至) | 5922-5925 |
页数 | 4 |
期刊 | Angewandte Chemie - International Edition |
卷 | 52 |
期 | 23 |
DOI | |
出版状态 | 已出版 - 3 6月 2013 |
已对外发布 | 是 |