TY - JOUR
T1 - Evaluation and comparison of aqueous ChCl/Urea and other physical absorbents for biogas upgrading process
AU - Ma, Chunyan
AU - Liu, Chang
AU - Lu, Xiaohua
AU - Ji, Xiaoyan
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
PY - 2017
Y1 - 2017
N2 - Biogas has been considered as an alternative renewable energy, and CO2 removal from raw biogas (i.e. biogas upgrading) is needed for producing biomethane used as vehicle fuels or injected into the natural gas grid. Biogas upgrading using physical absorbents is a simple and efficient technology with low energy requirements for regeneration. In this work, the conceptual process for biogas upgrading using 4 kinds of physical solvents, i.e. water, dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol (DEPG), propylene carbonate (PC) and aqueous choline chloride (ChCl) /urea (AQDES) was developed and simulated with Aspen Plus. The energy utilization, the amount of recirculated solvent and the diameters of absorber and desorber were analyzed based on equilibrium approach. After that, the rate-based simulation was established to evaluate the specific cost of the process using different solvents. Based on equilibrium approach the comparison between the solvents in respect to the energy utilization for biogas upgrading using different solvents shows the following order: DEPG > water > AQDES > PC, whereas the amount of recirculated solvent and the diameters of absorber and desorber follow another order: water > DEPG > AQDES > PC. The rate-based results show that the process using PC has the lowest total specific cost, followed by AQDES, water and DEPG.
AB - Biogas has been considered as an alternative renewable energy, and CO2 removal from raw biogas (i.e. biogas upgrading) is needed for producing biomethane used as vehicle fuels or injected into the natural gas grid. Biogas upgrading using physical absorbents is a simple and efficient technology with low energy requirements for regeneration. In this work, the conceptual process for biogas upgrading using 4 kinds of physical solvents, i.e. water, dimethyl ether of polyethylene glycol (DEPG), propylene carbonate (PC) and aqueous choline chloride (ChCl) /urea (AQDES) was developed and simulated with Aspen Plus. The energy utilization, the amount of recirculated solvent and the diameters of absorber and desorber were analyzed based on equilibrium approach. After that, the rate-based simulation was established to evaluate the specific cost of the process using different solvents. Based on equilibrium approach the comparison between the solvents in respect to the energy utilization for biogas upgrading using different solvents shows the following order: DEPG > water > AQDES > PC, whereas the amount of recirculated solvent and the diameters of absorber and desorber follow another order: water > DEPG > AQDES > PC. The rate-based results show that the process using PC has the lowest total specific cost, followed by AQDES, water and DEPG.
KW - Aspen Plus
KW - Biogas upgrading
KW - aqueous choline chloride /urea
KW - physical absorbent
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85041501091&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.255
DO - 10.1016/j.egypro.2017.12.255
M3 - 会议文章
AN - SCOPUS:85041501091
SN - 1876-6102
VL - 142
SP - 3631
EP - 3636
JO - Energy Procedia
JF - Energy Procedia
T2 - 9th International Conference on Applied Energy, ICAE 2017
Y2 - 21 August 2017 through 24 August 2017
ER -