TY - JOUR
T1 - Nature of the chemical bond between a transition metal and a group-13 element
T2 - Structure and bonding of transition metal complexes with terminal group-13 diyl ligands ER (E = B to Tl; R = Cp, N(SiH3)2, Ph, Me)
AU - Uddin, Jamal
AU - Boehme, Christian
AU - Frenking, Gernot
PY - 2000/2/21
Y1 - 2000/2/21
N2 - The equilibrium geometries and first TM-ER bond dissociation energies of 35 transition metal complexes with group-13 ligand atoms [(CO)4Fe-ECp], [(CO)4Fe-EN(SiH3)2], [(CO)5W-EN(SiH3)2], [(CO)4Fe-EPh], and [TM(ECH3)4] (TM = Ni, Pd, Pt; E = B, Al, Ga, In, Tl) have been calculated at the DFT level of theory using gradient-corrected exchange and correlation functionals (BP86). The bonding situation in the complexes was examined with the help of the NBO and CDA partitioning schemes. The calculations show that the bond energies of the TM-ER bonds are rather high and follow in all cases the trend B > Al > Ga ≈ In > Tl. The TM-ER bonds where R is a poor π-donor (Ph, CH3) are shorter and stronger than those where R is a π-donating group (Cp, N(SiH3)2). The NBO analysis of the TM-E interactions indicates that the nature of the TM-ER bond is mainly ionic and that the covalent contributions are less important. The covalent bond order of the TM-ER bonds is always < 1. The TM←ER σ-donation is clearly larger than the TM→ER π-back-donation when R is a strong π-donor. TM→ER π-back-donation becomes larger and may even become bigger than the TM←ER σ-donation when R is a weak π-donor.
AB - The equilibrium geometries and first TM-ER bond dissociation energies of 35 transition metal complexes with group-13 ligand atoms [(CO)4Fe-ECp], [(CO)4Fe-EN(SiH3)2], [(CO)5W-EN(SiH3)2], [(CO)4Fe-EPh], and [TM(ECH3)4] (TM = Ni, Pd, Pt; E = B, Al, Ga, In, Tl) have been calculated at the DFT level of theory using gradient-corrected exchange and correlation functionals (BP86). The bonding situation in the complexes was examined with the help of the NBO and CDA partitioning schemes. The calculations show that the bond energies of the TM-ER bonds are rather high and follow in all cases the trend B > Al > Ga ≈ In > Tl. The TM-ER bonds where R is a poor π-donor (Ph, CH3) are shorter and stronger than those where R is a π-donating group (Cp, N(SiH3)2). The NBO analysis of the TM-E interactions indicates that the nature of the TM-ER bond is mainly ionic and that the covalent contributions are less important. The covalent bond order of the TM-ER bonds is always < 1. The TM←ER σ-donation is clearly larger than the TM→ER π-back-donation when R is a strong π-donor. TM→ER π-back-donation becomes larger and may even become bigger than the TM←ER σ-donation when R is a weak π-donor.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0000147835&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1021/om990936k
DO - 10.1021/om990936k
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:0000147835
SN - 0276-7333
VL - 19
SP - 571
EP - 582
JO - Organometallics
JF - Organometallics
IS - 4
ER -