TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrastive analysis and crashworthiness optimization of two composite thin-walled structures
AU - Xie, Su Chao
AU - Zhou, Hui
AU - Liang, Xi feng
AU - Ren, Xin
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014, Central South University Press and Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg.
PY - 2014/11
Y1 - 2014/11
N2 - For the safety protection of passengers when train crashes occur, special structures are crucially needed as a kind of indispensable energy absorbing device. With the help of the structures, crash kinetic-energy can be completely absorbed or dissipated for the aim of safety. Two composite structures (circumscribed circle structure and inscribed circle structure) were constructed. In addition, comparison and optimization of the crashworthy characteristic of the two structures were carried out based on the method of explicit finite element analysis (FEA) and Kriging surrogate model. According to the result of Kriging surrogate model, conclusions can be safely drawn that the specific energy absorption (SEA) and ratio of specific energy absorption to initial peak force(REAF) of circumscribed circle structure are lager than those of inscribed circle structure under the same design parameters. In other words, circumscribed circle structure has better performances with higher energy-absorbing ability and lower initial peak force. Besides, error analysis was adopted and the result of which indicates that the Kriging surrogate model has high nonlinear fitting precision. What is more, the SEA and REAF optimum values of the two structures have been obtained through analysis, and the crushing results have been illustrated when the two structures reach optimum SEA and REAF.
AB - For the safety protection of passengers when train crashes occur, special structures are crucially needed as a kind of indispensable energy absorbing device. With the help of the structures, crash kinetic-energy can be completely absorbed or dissipated for the aim of safety. Two composite structures (circumscribed circle structure and inscribed circle structure) were constructed. In addition, comparison and optimization of the crashworthy characteristic of the two structures were carried out based on the method of explicit finite element analysis (FEA) and Kriging surrogate model. According to the result of Kriging surrogate model, conclusions can be safely drawn that the specific energy absorption (SEA) and ratio of specific energy absorption to initial peak force(REAF) of circumscribed circle structure are lager than those of inscribed circle structure under the same design parameters. In other words, circumscribed circle structure has better performances with higher energy-absorbing ability and lower initial peak force. Besides, error analysis was adopted and the result of which indicates that the Kriging surrogate model has high nonlinear fitting precision. What is more, the SEA and REAF optimum values of the two structures have been obtained through analysis, and the crushing results have been illustrated when the two structures reach optimum SEA and REAF.
KW - Kriging surrogate model
KW - composite structure
KW - contrastive analysis
KW - crashworthiness optimization
KW - finite element analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84919934899&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s11771-014-2439-9
DO - 10.1007/s11771-014-2439-9
M3 - 文章
AN - SCOPUS:84919934899
SN - 2095-2899
VL - 21
SP - 4386
EP - 4394
JO - Journal of Central South University
JF - Journal of Central South University
IS - 11
ER -