液压鼓胀试验技术和小冲孔试验技术对比研究

Jian Sheng Zou, Han Kui Wang, Xiang Ling, Bi Nan Shou, Tong Xu

科研成果: 期刊稿件文章同行评审

1 引用 (Scopus)

摘要

The small punch test (SPT) and the hydraulic bulge test(HBT)are systematically compared, the advantages and disadvantages of each test technique are contrasted by comparing the test device, the sample form, test principle, test procedure, strength caculation method and application field. The device of SPT is simple and easy to operate, but there are many influence factors in the process of SPT, the force analysis of material performance is complex, there are too many variables in the calculation result.HBT is based on the SPT and draw lessons from the principle of rupture disc, the equipment of it has high requirements, but the force is relatively simple and easy to establish the theoretical model. Different loading mechanisms lead to different sample rupture positions. Both of them can be correlated with conventional mechanical tests, but HBT has semi theoretical analytical solutions based on theoretical models and is more accurate.

投稿的翻译标题Technical Comparative Study of Hydraulic Bulge Test and the Small Punch Test
源语言繁体中文
页(从-至)1-8
页数8
期刊Petrochemical Equipment
47
6
DOI
出版状态已出版 - 25 11月 2018

关键词

  • Contrastive
  • Hydraulic bulge test
  • Small punch test
  • Study

指纹

探究 '液压鼓胀试验技术和小冲孔试验技术对比研究' 的科研主题。它们共同构成独一无二的指纹。

引用此